Foreclosure case on despite glitch, confusion


A suburban West Palm Beach foreclosure case has even bank employees confused, with internal emails that question whether the wrong entity is repossessing the house – but that then decide to move forward anyway.

Bank attorneys now want to purge the court file with the messages, which were filed mistakenly. The emails also mention trying to avoid mounting community association fees.

“I think the emails basically say the plaintiff doesn’t own the loan, and it belongs to a different lender,” said attorney Peter Snyder, who is representing Abby Lopez. “It may be Bank of America, or Bank of America could just be the servicer. That’s where it all gets crazy.”


HOA Threatens Foreclosure On Couple Stationed Overseas


A San Antonio couple, serving in the military overseas, almost loses their home. Not because they failed to make their mortgage payments, but because they were behind on their homeowners association fees. This military couple was fighting a losing battle, so they asked News 4 Trouble Shooter Jaie Avila for help.

David and Melody Gates admit they fell behind on their homeowners association fees when Melody got sick, but they say when they tried to pay what they owed, the association and its attorney kept sending their checks back and piling on more fees.

We interviewed the Gates using a web camera, because the couple is stationed at an air force base in Germany.

The Gates say since late last year, they have sent three separate checks to the Westover Crossing Homeowners Association to pay off all the dues they owe for their home. But each time, the checks were returned, because by the time they arrived in the mail, more late fees, and attorneys fees had been added to the total. The attorney for the association refused to accept partial payment.

“Every time they mail it back to me, they tell me I owe them more money,” says Melody Gates. “They tell me that I owe them late fees and I also, on top of that, I owe them attorney fees. And I don’t understand why a company, knowing that we’re so far away, is being so unjust to us.”

After six months of this, the Gates’ bill grew from $1,100 to more than $1,800.

The homeowners association filed a lien against their home and was threatening foreclosure. So the desperate couple e-mailed the Trouble Shooters.

“I reached out to you, because I don’t know what else to do,” says Gates. “We have tried very hard to make this bill paid in full.”

The Trouble Shooters contacted Spectrum Management, which runs the Westover Crossing Homeowners Association, and its attorney, Tom Newton, Jr., the man who has been sending the Gates’ all those intimidating letters.

Newton wouldn’t comment, but this isn’t the first time the Trouble Shooters have come across attorney, Tom Newton.

Last year, Newton, who was working for another homeowners association, foreclosed on an elderly disabled couple, Dan and Elaine lambert, because they hadn’t paid $380 in HOA fees.

At the time he said he felt justified in foreclosing on struggling homeowners who are only a few hundred dollars behind on their HOA dues.

“I feel comfortable in taking those steps necessary to enforce my client’s legal rights,” said Newton at the time. “And if that means that ultimately somebody may go through this foreclosure process, it is unfortunate. But it is a consequence of their own making.”

Although, he wouldn’t talk to us, a few days after we contacted Newton, he and the Westover Crossing Homeowners Association agreed to stop tacking on fees and settled the dispute with the gates for $1,300. Almost $600 less than they had been demanding.

If you fall behind on your HOA fees, they can legally do the same thing to you. Be sure to read your deed restrictions which should explain what kind of notice they have to give you before trying to foreclose. And get them to agree to a re-payment plan in writing, to avoid unexpected fees.

Subdivision residents vote to oust HOA board

r/Northeast Herald

A neighborhood association dispute is headed to court after homeowners met and voted to remove the association’s board of directors and install a new and larger board.

Homeowners in the Ventura and Spring Meadows subdivisions in northeast Bexar County met June 30 and voted 221-1 to remove the association’s current board members — President Lisa Pfeiffer, Vice President Vicki Pawelek and Secretary Kathleen Vargas — after a tumultuous eight months that saw the board close its monthly meetings to the public, remove lifeguards from the community pool and discontinue participation in the county Citizens On Patrol program.

The group of homeowners called a special meeting and gathered at Northeast Church of Christ on FM 78 and voted to remove the three board members, to enlarge the board to five members and to fill the board with a new slate of board members.

But attorney Susan Rice, speaking on behalf of the Ventura Homeowners Association, told those gathered that their votes didn’t count and that any action taken that evening would end up in court.

“Basically, it’s the corporation’s position that this is not a properly called meeting, pursuant to the governing documents; nor are the votes that are going to be taken proper.

“It does not mean that tomorrow morning your votes are going to be honored,” she said, adding, “Those are going to be going through the court system and we’ll be dealing with those through the courts.”

But Lanny Worel, one of a group of organizers of the special meeting, disagreed.

“We feel that this meeting is lawfully called and … in compliance with association bylaws, and that any and all business that takes place here tonight will be valid and binding,” Worel said.

The association board tried to file a restraining order to keep the meeting from happening, but a county judge found no validity in the association’s complaint and allowed the meeting to go forth.

“In November, the board of directors closed the board meetings to all of us, none of us could go,” Worel said. “It was three months later that (they) began sending out invitations. Without an invitation, you couldn’t attend.”

Worel was one of five Ventura/Spring Meadows homeowners elected to the board during the meeting. Also elected to the board were Tony Jones, Evelyn Nolde, Stephen Turner and Gary Siegel.

Worel said the board has done everything in its power to stop the group from meeting, despite the group’s gathering of enough signatures to properly call a special meeting of the association. The board told Worel’s group that the petition contained invalid signatures, but refused to give the group a list of any faulty signatures.

The group decided in May to call the special meeting, assured they had enough valid signatures to do so. A letter dated May 15 was sent to the board, citing articles and sections of the Ventura bylaws that allowed for such a meeting to take place.

Once a quorum was established at the meeting, a motion was made to remove all three current board members from their positions. A ballot vote was taken and the motion passed, 221-1. The next motion sought expansion of the board from three to five members, which was approved 223-0. Names of seven homeowners were put on a ballot and the five were selected.

Residents openly questioned why the board meetings were closed, and asked who was responsible for monitoring the board’s actions.

Worel explained that the homeowner associations are governed under the non-profit corporation act and that board meetings are not mandated to be open, “but what we go by is the (people) who have been here for over 20 years, board meetings have always been open except for a short time in 2007, when they simply didn’t hold meetings.”

Jones, a subdivision resident since 1999, said, “If you pay your dues, you should have a say in how your money is spent. If they take that away from you, you should also be allowed to say, ‘If I don’t have a say, then why am I paying you?’”

Homeowners expressed anger over the board’s decision to cancel its lifeguard contract at the pool and replace it with a camera-security system.

“I’ve never seen a camera give CPR,” Jones said. “By the time you see it on camera, what’s happened has happened.”

“It was a total three-person decision,” Worel said. “It was not our decision to do away with the lifeguards and put a web-based camera in there for security.”

The pool was closed for a period of time following a June 11 investigation by the San Antonio Metropolitan Health Department. A resident who spoke during the meeting said she called the health district on June 8 following a weekend swim.

“I was disappointed with the condition of the water, it was filthy,” said resident Yvonne Rex. “That was Saturday; on Monday morning, I called the Metro Health Department and filed a complaint, because they (association management) didn’t seem too concerned.

“They officially closed it down (June 11) because of the condition of the water. Come to find out, the filter was broken … but my question is, how long had the filter been broken, and they were still allowing people to use the pool, with that disgusting water?” she added.

Lifeguards in neighboring subdivisions commonly perform hourly or bi-hourly water sampling in addition to enforcing hourly safety breaks and monitoring pool attendance.

Worel said that since the June 30 meeting, both sides have agreed to enter into mediation.

“We don’t know where it will go from here; all we can do is do our best and then carry on,” he said.

San Antonio Homeowners Association May Go Bankrupt and Cause 48 Families to be HomelessSan Antonio Homeowners Association May Go Bankrupt and Cause 48 Families to be Homeless


by Arthur Jameson Saturday, Jul. 25, 2009 at 11:35 PM

Former San Antonio HOA President has requested that a bankruptcy attorney be appointed HOA Receiver, for his own personal gain, while fate of homeowners and residents looms in balance.


48 families may soon be out on the street, even though homeowners have paid their mortgages and homeowners association dues on time. What is worse is that local government officials, including the Texas Attorney General, have refused to intervene to help homeowners at the Village at Woodlake Homeowners Country Club Association. Many homeowners and tenants there are low-income, elderly, disabled, minorities, women and/or veterans and wish very much to keep their homes. 

The Village at Woodlake Homeowners Association is in a state of disrepair. Some say that it has been grossly mismanaged over the past few years. What’s more is that people live in a hostile, suppressive environment, and are afraid to peacefully assemble or speak out because they are constantly threatened with the prospect of lawsuits. One particular individual has essentially made a living suing people across the country over the past few decades. He knows that homeowners do not have the financial resources to go up against him, and has filed various nuisance lawsuits against homeowners. 

Unbeknownst to homeowners, this month, the former HOA President filed suit against the homeowners association, and therefore all homeowners. The previous President served himself, as the agent on record, and did not bother to notify homeowners of this action. He is seeking $225,000, of which he admits to having already taken $96,000. This is unheard of, considering that Board Members are supposed to serve in a voluntary capacity. 

The former President has requested that the court appoint a bankruptcy attorney as receiver of the HOA, to “liquidate the assets as he sees fit,” so that the former President may collect the full $225,000 to which he claims entitlement. 

Homeowners who are aware of this situation are outraged. The previous President seeks to be compensated for a management contract that he wrote for himself in September 2008. As a condition of the contract, he stipulated that homeowners bond and indemnify him. Homeowners never agreed to these terms, as the document was signed in secrecy by the former President and 3 other Board Members. The former Board did not seek competitive management bids prior to contracting the former President. Less expensive bids obtained by individual homeowners for actual property management companies were rejected before even being heard by the previous Board. 

There currently is no Board of Directors because Travelers Insurance considered the previous Board too much of a risk, and discontinued the Directors & Officers Liability policy on June 10, 2009, citing too many claims as their reason. Travelers cancelled the policy immediately after the former President frivolously filed suit against 8 homeowners for $1,000,000. He claimed alleged defamation and interference with the contract he signed with himself. Travelers has actually appointed legal counsel to defend those 8 homeowners against the previous HOA President’s allegations. 

The previous Board waited until there was no more insurance before they stepped down, and failed to give homeowners any resources for establishing a new Board or liability insurance. Prior to resigning, the former President actually threatened to sue his successors to the HOA Board, knowing that nobody in their right mind would assume the liability involved without insurance to protect them. 

Now there is no Homeowners Association Board, and homeowners hope that the courts may appoint an impartial, objective third party as receiver to the association so that normalcy may be reestablished. They want to regain control of their association and run things responsibly and fairly. 

Homeowners want to have a full accounting for the finances over the past 4 years, since homeowners have not been allowed to see utility statements or financial records during that time. The former President was even been subpoenaed for a contempt of court hearing on July 22, 2009, for failing to provide financial records for a forensic audit. However, his attorney requested that it be postponed until a later date. 

Homeowners simply want to know how their money has been spent over the past few years. While buildings and common areas have been deteriorating, it seems that one former HOA President thought it more prudent to pay himself than to fix several unsightly, structural and safety-related problems. Water in the pool is putrefying and at least one unit is not even inhabitable. 

Brian Mylar of San Antonio’s KSAT News has told only part of this story. You may view it online at the following link:

A hearing is scheduled at the Bexar County Court House, in San Antonio, Texas at 9am on Tuesday, July 28, 2009 (Reference Cause # 2009-CI-11491). 

Please plan to attend and follow this case until a satisfactory conclusion may be met for all homeowners and tenants involved.

Homeowner’s Hell


Homeowner’s Hell


Created On: Wednesday, 25 Feb 2009, 8:26 PM CST

DALLAS – Trumped-up charges, excessive interest, intimidation, and threats of foreclosure: that is what lawsuits filed by some residents claim is happening at a north Dallas condominium complex they say has become a homeowner’s hell.

Russell Hoff bought his condo at Casa Blanca Condominiums in 2007 thinking it would be a great investment. Instead, he says, it’s been a curse. “It’s been hell,” says Hoff. “You don’t even want to come home.”


Linda Pearson says she was dealing with the deaths of both of her parents when she got her $3,294.00 assessment. “I told him I’ll pay you $1000 now and work out the rest when I get back,” says Pearson. “He said, ‘No problem. I’ll just foreclose on your unit,’” Pearson told FOX 4. Pearson paid up. But the threat of foreclosure is real.

The Board had sent letters to owners demanding internal inspections of all units, stating they must have “matching appliances” that are “aesthetically pleasing,” “walls must be painted without cracks or bubbles,” “countertops must be without cracks or bubbles,” and “shower tiles must be clean” or the owners could be fined $200 a day.




Can HOAs be “fixed”?


During the show with Pia Trigiani we ask whether or not HOAs can be fixed and wondered what our listeners think.  We asked for comments and with permission on the authors, here they are.  You can listen to the show in the archives
Can HOAs be fixed?  Share your thoughts with us either on the blog in the comments section or by email to
Shu Bartholomew
On The Commons
Community Associations Need Bail-Out Too!



As you know we have fought hard here in Arizona to change the HOAs right to foreclose on a persons home.  We have at least succeeded in disallowing foreclosure for FINES/PENALTIES.  Thank CHORE and Eddie Farnsworth who CAI, AACM and all HOA Attorneys would like to see removed from the face of the earth. 
For the life of me I do not understand the thought processes that travel the brains of these people.  We here in Arizona with the assistance of Eddie Farnsworth tried to get a law passed that would require the home in foreclosure be sold for Fair Market Value, FMV.  This would at least leave the homeowner with $$$ instead of being left HOMELESS AND PENNILESS.
How many heartless men and women of CAI, AACM, HOA Attorneys, Developers/Builders are actually out there fighting against homeowners….SHAME ON THEM!!
Why have Pia and Molly Foley Healey in their leadership positions with CAI not used their power and influence to advocate for this??  Would they like for their children, mothers or family to be left homeless and penniless??  I am appalled at what CAI and others continue to advocate for…..the HOA Attorneys such as Carpenter, Ekmark, Maxwell, et al  actually outright LIED to the Legislators in their arguments AGAINST the legislation to help homeowners.
Actually in CHORES opinion, the root cause problem in HOAs are the HOA Attorneys and something must be done!
This whole mess is a very easy fixable problem and could be done, FINISHED by the end of every legislative session of year 2009.  But I now am resigned to the fact that those who fight us (and we know who they are) only care about their pocketbook and POWER with GREED hand in hand.
I have been asking for the Arizona Legislature to form a Task Force (a real one) to actually work to fix the many problems….so far nothing.
I hope I live long enough to see these things happen…..1) protect homeowners from losing their homes for as little as $50  and 2) see the creation of an agency (with teeth) that homeowners can get help from much like a homeowner can file a complaint against a Contractor who is out of control, 3)  management companies required to be licensed, bonded and registered by the States with punishments that hurt when they intimidate, harass and plain don’t take care of business.  (but of course CAI fights against this, along with all the others that feed from the assessment trough)
Shu, sorry this is so long but I am angry and I don’t want to hear anymore bullshit from persons like Pia who actually has power to change things….but obviously doesn’t want to!!!
Pat Haruff
Coalition of HomeOwners for Rights and Education
How should we handle the growing problems in HOAs? 
Basically, we need to inject Democracy to the HOA equation…this is pretty simple and we already have laws on the books to address the process, we just need to get the HOAs to follow the Law and we would see most of the bad HOAs disappear from the face of the earth within a year.
1. Institute term limits on the “contracted private enforcement regime” that includes ARC control, and the debt payment to pay for the private police to enforce the rules.  10 year terms are in the Texas property code, but there is also “automatic renewals” allowed – the automatic renewal must be eliminated as this creates perpetuities (prohibited by a numerated in the Texas constitution bill of rights).
2. Require that the extension/renewal of the contract require the successful petition of the present-day owners.  Should the HOA fail to get the signatures required within 180 days, the HOA shall be dissolved and re-structured into a non-profit corporation that operates on Donations.  Structure these so that the donations become a tax deduction or Tax Credit to the City – and the city will be forced to maintain the common areas (if any) thru raising taxes on all of the properties to pay for any shortfall.  The Tax credit to the city would encourage people to give to the HOA, as it would reduce their taxes to the city. (up to $200 per year would be good enough to cover the HOA fees any of my HOAs need)
Oh where to begin.   I hope this doesn’t ramble.  I have had a lot of interruptions and I had hoped to get this email out earlier in the day.  I am standing by to watch the program on cox cable.  
The only thing nice about our HOA is you sort of feel a little safer as your neighbors are close and you have a gate that needs a little gadget to open but many just push their car into the  gate and it opens.  Other than that there is no benefit to living in our HOA.  It is a money pit.  And the board in our opinion is not doing an adequate job in the financial and athestic area.  Our HOA has been a money pit.   And you experience gastapo type boards with personal agendas and don’t conduct financial oversight of the homeowners monies and seems chronism is used in selecting contracted entities.  sort of a family affair.   family businesses.  We live in an HOA in Meza Arizona and we have been here since 1998.   Our home was 10 months old when we moved in, so we have been here from the beginning.   So we are well experienced why we must obtain  government oversight and audit of HOAs and prosecution of individuals who are found guilty of  improperly handling of homeowners monies, or just do away with HOA’s altogether.  This is along the lines of an individual who handles say Social Security benefits of another and is found guilty of not spending the person’s soc. money on that person but instead spends it elsewhere. When I lived in Rapid City South Dakota many years ago, a man was prosecuted and convicted of improperly handling another persons Social benefits and served time in prison.    Whether he was actually guilty or not he did not keep records that showed the person’s social security money was spent on that person.   He handled many person’s social security benefits.    Whenever one entity handles another’s monies, there has to be Govt. oversight to ensure monies are handled properly and proper accounting takes place .  To protect the public.  We, the homeowners, are the public.  Yearly audits need to be conducted and evaulated as to whether fiduciary responsibilites have been adhered to.  A State agency should be deligated with oversight, and must be available to hear complaints and render decisions at minimal cost to the HOA/homeowners.   
Board of Directors are not held accountable under State law and it is basically a free for all and they can do whatever they want, unless a homeowner spends the money & time asking for financial documents and takes it upon themselves to obtain and do their own “oversight” and auditing .  Which is what we are in the process of doing going back with our board of directors and management company going back to 2005.   But our HOA has never been adequately and properly managed.    It has been a nightmare.  
Bids are not properly obtained and much chronism can exist as board of directors have no statues or rules to follow and they pick their friends or family members to serve as the contractors.  And then of course set what to pay them.  They do not follow the bylaws.   Our copy isn’t even signed, so perhaps they don’t exist ?  How would we know – there is no state law  we can go to tell us if they are official as they aren’t signed.    There is nothing that tells us what state laws govern our HOA.   Who do I go to to ask.  our board holds maybe 2 meetings a year unless someone tries to get them removed and then boy do they scurry around trying to give the impression they are on top of all activities, but still not providing financial documents.  The mindset is that homeowners must ask for information.   We don’t agree.   Can you imagine some 150 plus people at a one to 1 and 1/2 hour meeting trying to discuss topics. We never get an agenda and never are notified more than 7 days in advance of a meeting.  The only reason is that particpation is really discouraged.   Boards need to conduct audits and even get a cpa to do an audit and put the information out to homeowners.   Boards are not following the process to elect new board members, which is by way of a selection committee that has to be comprised of members that are not currently on the board, and they also feel that a resume is needed.   Nothing in our bylaws requires that.    And they are trying to keep it at 5 members when in fact 7 were initially on the board when the community was built and the state laws nor bylaws restricts the number of people who can serve on the board so all homeowners could serve if they wanted to. 
I think that is one way to solve so many problems with HOAs  - state law should define the board of directors as the homeowners. which then prevents one set of individuals  making all the decisions for everyone and will ensure things are kept open, fair, and honest, and there is adequate and sufficient accounting of monies and expenditures and contracts and fullfillment of contracts, and no chronism, and provides for new rules approved by majority vote to be added to the bylaws.    Bylaws have to be updated and include State laws.   Ours sit as they were written in 1996 and are not signed and have never been updated/revised etc.     If we are to govern ourselves, then all homeowners within the HOA need to do the governing.  That is basically what the bylaws allow and state law allows but boards are often gastapo type boards, like ours, and don’t want other homeowners involved in any manner.  That is not the intent when HOA ’s were establsihed.   The board of directors was only established as four key postions on the board is of necessity – a president, vice president, secretary and treasurer and also includes other directors.   laws are non existent and/or vague and bylaws are so vague boards become quickly and easily out of control.  If all homeowners have a say and proper voting takes place, it will be a win win for all homeowners.   
State laws should require that rules made by HOA’s have to be approved by a 2/3 majority vote of members and proxy voting needs to be allowed.  And rules adopted need to be amended to the bylaws.   Doing away with proxy voting hurts homeowners.  Half of our homeowners live elsewhere and most of them are out of state.   
Right now we have the Fire safety building who can conduct hearings and an administrative laws judge will hear but that runs 500.00 to 2,000 – most homeowners would find that a financial hardship.  And the form is not what I would describe as really user friendly.  One would almost need to hire an attorney to help complete and file.  The boards don’t utilize this process as most would be found in the favor of the homeowner and that takes away from the board making money for the ? ????  So they use a lawfirm and rack up fees that all homeowners must assume.    Boards have the descretion to handle monies and while common sense would tell them to go the cheapest and most efficient way that benefits the community, they do not.   they are not concerned about what money is spent or to whom.  how the money is tracked.   what information is given to homeowners.  HOA’s are a nightmare.    
In 2005 our reserves were down to about 2,000.    They have increased thankfully but we are far from what we should have in reserves, and it is the homeowners monthly association fees that has most certainly been the reason why reserves have increased as our monthly association fees have increased by 15% for a steady 3 years in a row with no explanation as to why the increase is needed.  This last increase was in August 2008 effective for January 2009  – so the full year for expenditures had not passed when the decision was made for the 15% increase.   how could they establish what percentage if any was needed for the 2009 fiscal year?   Additionally they just spent hundreds if not into the thousands of dollars putting in baby foilage and trees – if we are that hurting for monies that money should not have been spent as it was.   We have at least 4 homes that appear to be in foreclosure and in 2005 there was some 9,000 owed in monthly association fees by 3 homes (not in foreclosure)- one was small about 600.00 – the board spent some 7,000 to collect that 600.00 and we don’t believe the other 2 accounts were collected on?   documents we will ask to review.  Was selective enforcement practiced?  We have 78 homes and our monthly fee was at 35.00 when we moved in 1998,.  they are now at 108.00 a month.  We have only one pool.   Which has been a money pit.  And is hardly used by anyone.   The board just spent a lot of money on plants going into our winter season, but then still went ahead with implementing this newest 15% increase.   
I am out of time.   But I have given some insight to all the problems with HOAs.   but the problems are with the board of directors.  It needs to be all homeowners on the board.   
A listener from Arizona.





A lot can be said about community associations — and nothing is good!
Today’s economy shows clearly that the system is failing the owners. The only ones profiting: Attorneys and service providers. Instead of protecting property values — as purchasers were promised as a sales gimmick for buying into community associations — they are creating huge financial liabilities for the homeowners. Homeowners are forced to pay for their financially irresponsible neighbors and/or for developers — at the brink of bankruptcy — who use homeowners as their private piggy bank to pay their unpaid bills. So called bulk contracts — the favorite kickback scheme for developers, community association managers and board members — are doing exactly the opposite: Instead of huge savings these contracts force owners to pay double and triple the actual amount, because neighbors don’t pay and/or lots of homes in the community are just empty.
The system is flawed — and band-aids and/or biased committees will not fix it. Nor will surveys claiming that a wide majority of owners is “very happy.”
Owners need real solutions — not service providers and board members hiding behind the business judgment rule.
The financial welfare of million of families all around the nation are at stake. Everybody cries for bail-outs: Owners living in community associations need a special bail-out: Accountability of the people in charge and laws that make sense and protect the owners — and strict enforcement of these laws!
And fast — before it’s too late for many families!


Warm Regards,
Jan Bergemann, President
Cyber Citizens For Justice, Inc.


HOA Investigation Widens


I-Team: HOA Investigation Widens

It’s a time honored truism — whenever the FBI gets real quiet, that’s when you’d better start worrying. A law enforcement task force made up of federal agents and Metro detectives is pounding away at the HOA corruption case.

Among the more interesting leads they are checking out are rumors that some of the central suspects are trying to sell their businesses and move out of town and the likelihood that huge piles of ill-gotten cash were stashed in offshore bank accounts.

Lawmen have zeroed in on a cadre of main suspects, who are all in denial.

Attorney Nancy Quon is a familiar face to local television viewers. The construction defects attorney and fellow lawyer John Leach have co-hosted their show Homeowner Talk since the late 90’s, dispensing words of wisdom about homeowner associations, construction defects, and the law through the City of Las Vegas community channel.

Quon and Leach pay the city for the production and the show promotes their respective law firms.

Quon has used other publicly owned venues to raise her profile. She teaches construction defects classes for the State of Nevada Real Estate Division. As evidence of just how lucrative a niche her specialty is, the website for her law firm lists the biggest settlements she’s reached on behalf of homeowner associations. The total is more than $115 million.

A political corruption task force suspects that Quon didn’t succeed by playing by the rules.

Quon did not return phone calls but her attorney Stan Lee said that, as far as he knows, Quon is not a target of the investigation. Lee said Quon has spoken with law enforcement more than once but he would not say if she has agreed to become a cooperating witness.

Back in September, Quon’s law office was searched by agents looking for documents linking her to other principal suspects.

One of those other people, contractor Leon Benzer, owner of Silver Lining Construction, has certainly benefited by knowing Quon. The two are close personally, and Benzer reportedly performed extensive remodeling at Quon’s homes and office as payback for all the work she has steered his way.

He specializes in rehab work in communities plagued by construction defects, and wherever a homeowner association hired Quon to file a defects lawsuit, Benzer’s company usually gets the lucrative repair work.

On the day the task force made the investigation known, Benzer’s office was the first place to be searched. Benzer has told associates that he isn’t a target either.

It’s unknown if he has offered to cooperate with the government.

Benzer has also done extensive remodeling for his friend Lisa Kim, formerly Lisa Nicklin, president of Platinum Management Services which manages dozens of homeowner associations all over the valley.

Kim is married to decorated Metro Police Lieutenant Ben Kim, head of the fraud unit. Ben Kim is also a business partner with Leon Benzer.

On day one of the investigation, agents served search warrants at Platinum’s office. The company’s attorney said no one at the firm is a target, although residents at various Platinum managed communities have given information to the FBI, in particular about allegedly rigged elections.

Platinum is supposed to oversee elections to homeowner boards. Residents say the deck was stacked and that friends and employees of Benzers infiltrated the HOA’s then got themselves elected through scurrilous means.

“They looked like real ballots that came in. Someone duplicated ballots, duplicated envelopes and mailed them en masse,” said Park Avenue residentLee Lahargue.

“Platinum is collaborating with what’s going on,” said Park Avenue board member Barbara Noto.

Lisa Kim has not returned phone calls and it is not known if she has decided to spill the beans to investigators.

In all, 43 names have surfaced in the investigation, more than a dozen sites have been searched, thousands of pages of documents have been seized and are being analyzed.

No one linked to the task force will talk about the probe, but sources familiar with the effort say the agents and detectives have more information than they know what to do with and more coming in daily.

Of less concern to the lawmen are the lower level players who worked as agents for the others and got themselves elected to as many as three homeowner boards at the same time.

Some of those are ex-Metro officers who will certainly be pressured to cooperate.

Koger Pleads Guilty to Embezzlement


Koger Pleads Guilty to Embezzlement
Still faces charges including attempted capital murder of police officers in Fairfax County.

By Ken Moore
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
The Herndon Connection

Jeffrey Koger

Jeffrey Scott Koger admitted to embezzling approximately $3 million from 400 homeowner associations using 140 bank wire transfers, according to statement of facts filed Monday, Nov. 10 with his plea agreement in federal court in Alexandria.

Koger, 39 of Oak Hill, embezzled the money and invested funds in personal accounts and businesses he was involved in, including: $733,000 in Jordan’s 8 restaurant on Capitol Hill; $374,960 to pay a contractor to remodel his Oak Hill house and the Tri-Fitness, Inc. facility in Annandale; $40,000 for a down payment on a 2005 Chevrolet Corvette convertible; $60,000 for a down payment on a house in New Mexico; and $56,668 for windows and doors for his home.   Read Article

Can anyone say “Hide the Banana!”


Homeowners requesting information about their accounts have been treated to the same rigmarole the forensic accountant and monitor are experiencing and complaining about.  Maybe the legislature will finally wake up and realize that giving associations unfettered power can lead to unbelievable abuses of that power.  - Shu

Court Hearing Set for Koger
Forensic accountant has difficulty obtaining financial records from bank, accused management company.
The Connection Newspapers – Nicholas M. Horrock – July 26, 2007

An Aug. 7 hearing has been scheduled in Fairfax Circuit Court after a forensic accountant and a court-ordered monitor reported difficulties in obtaining cooperation from the Koger Management Group, Inc. and its bank, BB&T.  Read the Whole Story

We are From CAI, and We’re Here to Help!


Once upon a time we believed the earth was flat. Then we got smart. Today we are told that associations protect property values. 

Just what is the official CAI position regarding this particular story and all the other embezzlement stories from around the country?  Maybe their position is that there are still plenty of management companies that have not yet been caught with their fingers in the cookie jar so this is “just an isolated incident.”  Koger Management Group was one of CAI’s elite members at one time.  So what now, CAI?

CAI has always opposed any kind of government oversight.  The only way Koger Management Group was caught, and is now being investigated, is because they had a real estate license.  Had it not been for that, it would be business as usual.  We have been advocating for some much needed independent and objective adult supervision in HOAs to protect the homeowners in mandatory membership associations.  If such a thing existed, how many other management companies would be under investigation today?

Kudos to Florida State Representative Julio Robaina for recognizing the need for this and for starting a pilot program in Miami-Dade to provide the oversight.

Here is the part of this story you are not likely to read in the papers.  My association, Lake Braddock, was also managed by Koger.  The official word is that “we” discovered that funds were missing BEFORE this story broke out and that “we” were able to recover monies that were allegedly embezzled from our coffers.  The problem is, “we” only audited the financial records covering a much shorter period of time than the period that these transfers and embezzlements allegedly were to have taken place and “we” do not plan on doing anything else about it because the president does not want to testify in court. So much for protecting property values! – Shu 

From the Washington Post
By Bill Turque
Friday, July 20, 2007

Losses Climb for Homeowner Groups
Accountant Says Management Official May Have Stolen $2 Million
RICHMOND, July 19 — At least $2 million was stolen from Northern Virginia condominium and homeowner associations, probably by a top executive of the Fairfax City company hired to manage their finances, a forensic accountant told state regulators at a hearing Thursday.The losses sustained by customers of Koger Management Group between 2004 and 2006, described in a report to the Virginia Real Estate Board, far exceed earlier estimates of $800,000. The total may grow as more homeowner associations conduct audits, said Jeffrey D. Barsky, the accountant appointed by the board to investigate the matter.  Read the Whole Story

« Previous entries Next Page » Next Page »